In an effort to help everyone win online I bring you yet another rigtard theory on how to beat the algorithm. This one is for FTP adn comes from a true genius over at CardsChat.
Free Lesson On Winning Against The FTP Algorithm
"Because a lot of you on here are good friends of mine, and I play with you on a regular basis, I wanted to put this together to help your game on Full Tilt.
Yes, the site is rigged, but it's rigged with an algorithm that was designed to catch colluding and maximize the sites profits by creating maximum betting.
Here is my First Lesson for you all to use and put in to practice when you hit the tables at Full Tilt.
THE BIG BLIND THEORY
Ever Wonder Why Your AAs get Cracked when you are in the big blind...
1) SB position has a 80% or greater of winning their hand no matter what they hold as long as the BB is out and they do not go all in. Going all in seems to skew the chances of the SB, so it's possibly some other rules that go into effect. Most of your bad beats, should be against the SB position or BB, which I will talk about next.
2) When you have BB vs SB statistically the winning cards go in favor of the BB unless the SB player can persuade the BB to fold his/her cards.
3) This last one is still a work in progress to understand how it works completely. When the SB is out and BB is in the hand versus other players the BB position has extremely large chance of losing the hand.
How to practice this theory, fold no matter what you have on the BB, and make your moves on the SB, and Dealer, as well as +1 from the dealer.
I have also noticed that if you are in middle position and go against the big blind you will win more then 80% of the time.
Good Luck out there guys, and I hope to hear some feedback from you guys that try this out."
So there you have it, all you need to make the big bucks. I take FT transfers if anyone wants to pay me back for this miracle tip.
Saturday, July 24, 2010
Thursday, July 22, 2010
CardsChats Newest Rigtard
So this new rigtard has been posting at CardsChat for the last few days. Standard rigtard spew. Big winner live, online loser, must be rigged, small sample sizes, never wins a flip, blah, blah, bullshit. So after a few of these rigtarded posts he posts this:
"oh, and 0 for 11 on coin flips in cash games today, all chips in the middle pre-flop.
totally utterly rigged."
So being the rigtard intolerant asshole I am I come back with:
"Prove it. Ship all your hhs from cash games today and I'll load them in PT3 to see if you actually were 0 for 11 in coinflips today. I think you're full of shit and you'll not do this. I also think you suffer from selective memory and if you had some tracking software yourself you'd see that the sites don't hate you, you just suck.
If you want to send me the hands send me a PM and I'll give you my email address, if you are unwilling please stfu."
Guess what? No hand histories. He said he didn't want anyone to know his screen name. When I suggested he do a global search and replace for his username in the HH files he just ignored it. Fucking rigtards, not letting me properly laugh at them pisses me off.
"oh, and 0 for 11 on coin flips in cash games today, all chips in the middle pre-flop.
totally utterly rigged."
So being the rigtard intolerant asshole I am I come back with:
"Prove it. Ship all your hhs from cash games today and I'll load them in PT3 to see if you actually were 0 for 11 in coinflips today. I think you're full of shit and you'll not do this. I also think you suffer from selective memory and if you had some tracking software yourself you'd see that the sites don't hate you, you just suck.
If you want to send me the hands send me a PM and I'll give you my email address, if you are unwilling please stfu."
Guess what? No hand histories. He said he didn't want anyone to know his screen name. When I suggested he do a global search and replace for his username in the HH files he just ignored it. Fucking rigtards, not letting me properly laugh at them pisses me off.
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
The Special Kind of Rigtard
From 2p2:
"rigged is the wrong word....the RNG is flawed....why so many sites with the same software....u dont go into the bellagio cardroom and get cards that were shuffled at wynn or the vic in london...its about time there was a live shuffle and not this rng rubbish that is fantastic at dealing out hands that leave you looking at the gods so often (hands involved in all ins and deep into torneys relatively big pots) it makes a mockery of the odds....people talk about standard deviation...thay should call it regular deviation in online poker because it happens all the time....i have never been beaten in relatively big pots so many times when 2-1 3-1 4-1 and 6-1 favorite ...it happens too much and is a farce...the sooner a live shuffle the better but that would mean the online sites wouldnt make as much money....its bad enough in a showdown when u get a split second to look at oppenents hands.....just like the f......g greedy bankers grab grab grab...at least the original paradise poker site gave enough time for players to see showdown hands but now anymore its all greed now. "
You almost have to feel sorry for this kind as it's pretty obvious that he's not playing with a full deck. Anyone with a fully functional brain should be able to see that this type of rigging would be very easily caught. Then again maybe the poker sites only rig it against players who don't have tracking software??? Actually surprised I've never seen a rigtard come up with that one yet.
"rigged is the wrong word....the RNG is flawed....why so many sites with the same software....u dont go into the bellagio cardroom and get cards that were shuffled at wynn or the vic in london...its about time there was a live shuffle and not this rng rubbish that is fantastic at dealing out hands that leave you looking at the gods so often (hands involved in all ins and deep into torneys relatively big pots) it makes a mockery of the odds....people talk about standard deviation...thay should call it regular deviation in online poker because it happens all the time....i have never been beaten in relatively big pots so many times when 2-1 3-1 4-1 and 6-1 favorite ...it happens too much and is a farce...the sooner a live shuffle the better but that would mean the online sites wouldnt make as much money....its bad enough in a showdown when u get a split second to look at oppenents hands.....just like the f......g greedy bankers grab grab grab...at least the original paradise poker site gave enough time for players to see showdown hands but now anymore its all greed now. "
You almost have to feel sorry for this kind as it's pretty obvious that he's not playing with a full deck. Anyone with a fully functional brain should be able to see that this type of rigging would be very easily caught. Then again maybe the poker sites only rig it against players who don't have tracking software??? Actually surprised I've never seen a rigtard come up with that one yet.
Monday, July 19, 2010
Lol Classic
A oldie but a goodie (in this case goodie means seriously no one can be that stupid can they?) from CardsChat.
I can end the arguement for all the knuckleheads guessing
"I know a programmer who helped create the Poker Stars shuffle.According to him it is rigged as its a necessary evil from a business standpoint. Though not rigged for a specific individual the hands are rigged in a number of ways.First and foremost,80% of players on poker stars are bad poker players,the kind that call big bets on low percentage hands,or will even raise themselves on a bad hand.If it fell according to normal percentages the poker sharks would drain such players and drain them real quick.If a bad player was contstantly losing his butt he would get frustrated and not come back.If the 80% of bad players all left,so goes 80% of the sites profits with them.By rigging it to dish alot of bad river beats it gives bad players who should have folded out a more even playing field with the sharks who would have taken all their cash.Its not just about bad beats either.Your chip count matters especially in tournies.In a tourney if you have the highest stack in the hand being played its programmed for the come from behind beats on 4th or river 70% of the time if the higher calls the lows all in.You'll see it happen constantly a hand where a lower chips goes all in preflop with pocket aces and a high stacks calls with like a 4 and 5 off suit.Flop dishes a 3rd ace with king and ten,last two cards 2 and 3 to give it to the higher chip caller with the ace to 5 straight.By rigging it this way it puts the odds with higher chips regardless of who had the percentages to win but keeps it so in the long run all the low chip callers do get some hits to block the arguement its rigged.Thats the key is to rig it at a certain percentage this way a trend don't happen all the time,the low chips can still hit the high chip at 30% to quell any arguement that its plain out rigged for the high chip (which technically it is if its going to give it to him 70% of the time regardless of what high chips came in with).You'll also notice if you pay attention that the first 4 cards flopped are often two of two different suits to leave flush possibilities for multiple hands going into the river,and often these also have a straight draw potential in their to keep the max amount in the hand betting big.Many times that final river card in these situations will dish a flush but with a card that also gave another caller his straight.Its by design this is not a coincidence.The program is alot more complicated then people even realize.
The endorsements of this site are paid for endorsements with the companies taking poker stars at their word of how the shuffle works,these companies didn't pay any programmer to comb through the program and actually see how the shuffle happens in reality.I asked the exact same question to him as people here ask,why would they risk rigging it if where people could figure it out and stop playing there.He said "Simply put,the general masses are really stupid and are willing to trust any business unless there is clear cut proof of rigging.As long as the low chips don't get bad beat every single hand they all in they can't claim its always rigged for high chips,as long as bad river fish don't win on the river everytime people can't say the rivers are rigged so thats why you rig it at a certain percentage so its not really able to be proven cause anyone can win the hand even if the percentages are fixed based on chip count and table action as opposed to the percentages based on the cards.He even told me of a time the program hit a glitch and all tournies for the day had to be shut down while they figured out what happened with the program.In dealing its usual drama hands to keep table action high in a tourney,the program miscalculated and threw a 5th ace.I actually looked it up on search engines to see if anyone ever spoke of this and found a screen shot of the tourney he was talking about http:/wtfpokerstars.ytmnd.com (link edited to go directly to the image). They had to fine tune the program to make sure it didn't misread whats left in the deck again but the rigged drama flops remain in play,thats part was never altered.I asked him how they could get away with it if they were caught red handed,explanation "Well if people who saw it want an explanation its simple,tell them it was a hacker who compromised the shuffle and make the guy who got the five aces sign up with a new screen name and inform him if he talks about what happened in game rooms,specifically mentioning that the 5th ace came from poker stars end and not from some program he was using,he would be banned".
So to sum it up they rig the site cause they know they can and its not just to make a few bucks,over the course of a year the way its programmed it generates them multi millions more in profits and its done in a way that can look questionable too many but can never really be proven.They bank on the majority trusting them unless actual positive proof can be shown its rigged (which it never can be unless a hacker got into their program and actually spelled it out for us exactly how the shuffle is working).If you read message boards all over the web you will see they made the right gamble cause the majority of people stick up for them and say "its not rigged,that would be stupid what could they gain from that?" The answer is they gain alot from that and by keeping it rigged specifically by a certain percentage to give the bad rivers and such,its kept so that the sharks can't take all the bad players money but at the same time the sharks will still get their own share of wins to keep everyone happy (or so they theorized).I play there myself,just the free money for fun and to watch to see if the trends he spoke of is true and the way the flops happen with alot of river beats,and specifically alot of higher chips players getting bailed out of low percentage hands on the river and it is very consistent with the system he explained to me.So you can all debate about if its rigged or not.I will go with the words of an actual creator of the shuffle.He had to sign a secrecy form on how the shuffle works so that the prgrammers can't speak publicly and compromise the sites integrity.I on the other hand am just a friend of his and signed nothing,just relaying what i heard to keep players informed and save them from having their money stolen from them *winks*"
Take that knuckleheads. What is the fascination the rigtards have with losing on the river? It's as if they think that because it's the last card to hit the board it means so much more than the rest of the cards. Honestly if some site wanted to rig their shit they'd probably get by with it if they never dealt a "bad beat" on the river but fucked everyone on the turn.
I can end the arguement for all the knuckleheads guessing
"I know a programmer who helped create the Poker Stars shuffle.According to him it is rigged as its a necessary evil from a business standpoint. Though not rigged for a specific individual the hands are rigged in a number of ways.First and foremost,80% of players on poker stars are bad poker players,the kind that call big bets on low percentage hands,or will even raise themselves on a bad hand.If it fell according to normal percentages the poker sharks would drain such players and drain them real quick.If a bad player was contstantly losing his butt he would get frustrated and not come back.If the 80% of bad players all left,so goes 80% of the sites profits with them.By rigging it to dish alot of bad river beats it gives bad players who should have folded out a more even playing field with the sharks who would have taken all their cash.Its not just about bad beats either.Your chip count matters especially in tournies.In a tourney if you have the highest stack in the hand being played its programmed for the come from behind beats on 4th or river 70% of the time if the higher calls the lows all in.You'll see it happen constantly a hand where a lower chips goes all in preflop with pocket aces and a high stacks calls with like a 4 and 5 off suit.Flop dishes a 3rd ace with king and ten,last two cards 2 and 3 to give it to the higher chip caller with the ace to 5 straight.By rigging it this way it puts the odds with higher chips regardless of who had the percentages to win but keeps it so in the long run all the low chip callers do get some hits to block the arguement its rigged.Thats the key is to rig it at a certain percentage this way a trend don't happen all the time,the low chips can still hit the high chip at 30% to quell any arguement that its plain out rigged for the high chip (which technically it is if its going to give it to him 70% of the time regardless of what high chips came in with).You'll also notice if you pay attention that the first 4 cards flopped are often two of two different suits to leave flush possibilities for multiple hands going into the river,and often these also have a straight draw potential in their to keep the max amount in the hand betting big.Many times that final river card in these situations will dish a flush but with a card that also gave another caller his straight.Its by design this is not a coincidence.The program is alot more complicated then people even realize.
The endorsements of this site are paid for endorsements with the companies taking poker stars at their word of how the shuffle works,these companies didn't pay any programmer to comb through the program and actually see how the shuffle happens in reality.I asked the exact same question to him as people here ask,why would they risk rigging it if where people could figure it out and stop playing there.He said "Simply put,the general masses are really stupid and are willing to trust any business unless there is clear cut proof of rigging.As long as the low chips don't get bad beat every single hand they all in they can't claim its always rigged for high chips,as long as bad river fish don't win on the river everytime people can't say the rivers are rigged so thats why you rig it at a certain percentage so its not really able to be proven cause anyone can win the hand even if the percentages are fixed based on chip count and table action as opposed to the percentages based on the cards.He even told me of a time the program hit a glitch and all tournies for the day had to be shut down while they figured out what happened with the program.In dealing its usual drama hands to keep table action high in a tourney,the program miscalculated and threw a 5th ace.I actually looked it up on search engines to see if anyone ever spoke of this and found a screen shot of the tourney he was talking about http:/wtfpokerstars.ytmnd.com (link edited to go directly to the image). They had to fine tune the program to make sure it didn't misread whats left in the deck again but the rigged drama flops remain in play,thats part was never altered.I asked him how they could get away with it if they were caught red handed,explanation "Well if people who saw it want an explanation its simple,tell them it was a hacker who compromised the shuffle and make the guy who got the five aces sign up with a new screen name and inform him if he talks about what happened in game rooms,specifically mentioning that the 5th ace came from poker stars end and not from some program he was using,he would be banned".
So to sum it up they rig the site cause they know they can and its not just to make a few bucks,over the course of a year the way its programmed it generates them multi millions more in profits and its done in a way that can look questionable too many but can never really be proven.They bank on the majority trusting them unless actual positive proof can be shown its rigged (which it never can be unless a hacker got into their program and actually spelled it out for us exactly how the shuffle is working).If you read message boards all over the web you will see they made the right gamble cause the majority of people stick up for them and say "its not rigged,that would be stupid what could they gain from that?" The answer is they gain alot from that and by keeping it rigged specifically by a certain percentage to give the bad rivers and such,its kept so that the sharks can't take all the bad players money but at the same time the sharks will still get their own share of wins to keep everyone happy (or so they theorized).I play there myself,just the free money for fun and to watch to see if the trends he spoke of is true and the way the flops happen with alot of river beats,and specifically alot of higher chips players getting bailed out of low percentage hands on the river and it is very consistent with the system he explained to me.So you can all debate about if its rigged or not.I will go with the words of an actual creator of the shuffle.He had to sign a secrecy form on how the shuffle works so that the prgrammers can't speak publicly and compromise the sites integrity.I on the other hand am just a friend of his and signed nothing,just relaying what i heard to keep players informed and save them from having their money stolen from them *winks*"
Take that knuckleheads. What is the fascination the rigtards have with losing on the river? It's as if they think that because it's the last card to hit the board it means so much more than the rest of the cards. Honestly if some site wanted to rig their shit they'd probably get by with it if they never dealt a "bad beat" on the river but fucked everyone on the turn.
Sunday, July 18, 2010
So Changing Dealers is the Difference
Today's idiot comes from CardsChat.
Online Poker
"For those of you not familiar with RNG's (random number generators) you may want to read this. I have been a part of developing RNG's for a few years. And would like online players to know that it is basically a "rigged" system. I know, I know, but just listen. Online poker sites are a business and they are not out to lose money or customers. Small money players ARE and WILL be the first to be sacrificed on these sites. Don't get me wrong if your playing freerolls to earn seats in events, Go for it. But as for putting your hard earned cash on these sites, that is a mistake. DoylesRoom uses the most annoying RNG ever created. FullTilt and BoDog use more "fairer" RNG systems. There is no way to actually simulate the shuffling of cards or the change in dealers. Some sites favor aggressive play and others favor smooth callers. YES THIS IS TRUE. Why do you think sites use the fact that these sites are for entertainmnet not gambling. Think hard about this. If you ran an online poker site would you really want the players that are dropping 2000 dollars a week to go play somewhere else? Absolutely not. Would you rather have a player that deposits 20 dollars and wins consistently or the 2000 dollar loser. Of course business minded people want the losers to stay on their sites.
Also if you think that all tables at every site are monitored for "cheats" you would be absolutely wrong!! This costs entirely too much money for sites and honestly it cannot be prevented. Especially in Sit and Go's. Sorry to burst everyones bubble but you would have more chances to win at live games in casinos. Of course you still have your cheats there, but they are alot easier to recognize with the actions and words they would have to use. For that info please check out my blog "How to spot cheats and uncool dealers" Anyway my best advice is to stay away from DoylesRoom, Pokerstars, and UltimateBet. Well really you should just avoid all online poker and hope that it comes to be illegal soon. They should only be limited to play money and freerolls. Let them make their money off of sponsors not good people like you and I. Thanks and stay away from online poker!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
Who knew that changing dealers in a casino made such a difference. No new decks online either! I half expected him to mention that you had less chance of sitting in a "hot" seat at home too since you likely only have 1 desk chair!
The sheer stupidity of it all is truly astounding.
Online Poker
"For those of you not familiar with RNG's (random number generators) you may want to read this. I have been a part of developing RNG's for a few years. And would like online players to know that it is basically a "rigged" system. I know, I know, but just listen. Online poker sites are a business and they are not out to lose money or customers. Small money players ARE and WILL be the first to be sacrificed on these sites. Don't get me wrong if your playing freerolls to earn seats in events, Go for it. But as for putting your hard earned cash on these sites, that is a mistake. DoylesRoom uses the most annoying RNG ever created. FullTilt and BoDog use more "fairer" RNG systems. There is no way to actually simulate the shuffling of cards or the change in dealers. Some sites favor aggressive play and others favor smooth callers. YES THIS IS TRUE. Why do you think sites use the fact that these sites are for entertainmnet not gambling. Think hard about this. If you ran an online poker site would you really want the players that are dropping 2000 dollars a week to go play somewhere else? Absolutely not. Would you rather have a player that deposits 20 dollars and wins consistently or the 2000 dollar loser. Of course business minded people want the losers to stay on their sites.
Also if you think that all tables at every site are monitored for "cheats" you would be absolutely wrong!! This costs entirely too much money for sites and honestly it cannot be prevented. Especially in Sit and Go's. Sorry to burst everyones bubble but you would have more chances to win at live games in casinos. Of course you still have your cheats there, but they are alot easier to recognize with the actions and words they would have to use. For that info please check out my blog "How to spot cheats and uncool dealers" Anyway my best advice is to stay away from DoylesRoom, Pokerstars, and UltimateBet. Well really you should just avoid all online poker and hope that it comes to be illegal soon. They should only be limited to play money and freerolls. Let them make their money off of sponsors not good people like you and I. Thanks and stay away from online poker!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
Who knew that changing dealers in a casino made such a difference. No new decks online either! I half expected him to mention that you had less chance of sitting in a "hot" seat at home too since you likely only have 1 desk chair!
The sheer stupidity of it all is truly astounding.
Saturday, July 17, 2010
This Hand History Tester is OMGRigged!
I've loved this since I first saw it.
Bill Rini's Hand Analyzer for Rigged Games
Just post any suspect hh and the app does all the work for you to determine the level of riggedness.
Classic stuff.
Bill Rini's Hand Analyzer for Rigged Games
Just post any suspect hh and the app does all the work for you to determine the level of riggedness.
Classic stuff.
Friday, July 16, 2010
And This Is What They Hang Their Hats On!
So if you read a few rigtard threads you'll see one common claim repeated, that a former FTP software developer posted that FTP is/was rigged.
I've traced that post back to it's source. It was originally posted online as a response to a rigtard blog post at My Poker Million on December 29, 2008.
Here is the text of that response written by "Bob Smith":
Their are many folk out there arguing about if online poker is rigged or not…I wold like to help put this to rest by stating that it is rigged in many different ways. i helped write some of the software for tiltware LLC…while working on the fulltilt site some of the other programmers and i were asked to install programming into the software that would recognize certain players and provide them with unbeatable hands. we were also asked to develope software that would provide what they called the”maximum oppurtunity to bet” which meant that the deals are rigged to deal out alot of good starting hands to alot of players so that the most betting possible would take place on every deal. The deal would then provide a monster flop in which atleast two players would be all in before the river.(ever wonder why nobody ever misses the flop online…because then no one would bet and that is not what fulltilt wants) This keeps the tourneys fast paced and exciting which players love. Fulltilt loves this too, the faster you lose the faster they can make more money off you by having enter another tourney.
There is also another way fulltilt cheats you out of cash with their own personal players. These players are called house players and are fulltime employees of the Fulltilt compnay. If you check some names and their online wins vs. loss records you will often find them with records that are simply unreal. I have seen some of these folks who win over 50 straight sessions without a loss…how can this be possible unless they are working on the inside. They come and go and change their names often but they play in the site with the full adavantage of being able to see all the cards in play and in the deck.
Another programming trick we wrote into the software at fulltilt is the levels trick…this trick takes place when a tournament has been running after the first break. The computer recognizes the different size of each players chip stack and begins to deal out hands in which a small stack will shove all in and a large stack will have a better hand to call with. Have you ever wondered why you get pocekt QQs with 1500 chips and the guy next to you gets pockets KKs and he has 10,000 chips? The answer is simple the site is programmed to get you to play as much as possible. So we programmed the site to eliminate the small stack as quickly as possible so that they can go enter another tourney asap. The site is even prgrammed to adjust the flop for big stacks so that even if the big stack calls your hand with nothing he will end up beating your good made hand by the river. Often times the site will deal you back to back hands with the same cards but maybe different colors or suits..this “glitch” is a sign that the computer is adjusting the shuffle to start elimnting small stacks and allow the tourney to finish quicker.
The sooner a tournament is done the faster fulltilt can have you back at another table spending more money…it is to this sites best interested to eliminate you from tables as fast as possbile. There is no one to regulate how the company manipulates the software to thier own advantage. There is no one to monitor how the company pays out its players and employees. Simply put, giving some offshore account your hard earned cash is simply insane. Thinking that these people arent cheating you out of your money is crazy, the site has many layers of hidden programming all set up to take full adavantage of all types of players from novice to expert.
the main reason i wrote this blog is to expose the fraud that takes place at online gaming site known as Fulltilt poker i was fired three months ago from the company that helped write the software..yes i am bitter and mad but i do fell everyone so know how bad fulltilt is and that is a site built by THIEVES!!
Of course the types of rigging Bobby is revealing to us would be so painfully obvious that anyone with a 100k hand db would be able to see them, yet that's not the case. Hmmm...that must mean one of two things:
1) Bob Smith is an idiot rigtard who is trying to legitimize rigtards everywhere
or
2) Bob Smith is a fucking genius who made up his BS response to get rigtards to believe it so he could reveal later that they're all fucking idiots!
Now I really want to believe it's number 2, but sadly I'm sure it's number 1. :(
I've traced that post back to it's source. It was originally posted online as a response to a rigtard blog post at My Poker Million on December 29, 2008.
Here is the text of that response written by "Bob Smith":
Their are many folk out there arguing about if online poker is rigged or not…I wold like to help put this to rest by stating that it is rigged in many different ways. i helped write some of the software for tiltware LLC…while working on the fulltilt site some of the other programmers and i were asked to install programming into the software that would recognize certain players and provide them with unbeatable hands. we were also asked to develope software that would provide what they called the”maximum oppurtunity to bet” which meant that the deals are rigged to deal out alot of good starting hands to alot of players so that the most betting possible would take place on every deal. The deal would then provide a monster flop in which atleast two players would be all in before the river.(ever wonder why nobody ever misses the flop online…because then no one would bet and that is not what fulltilt wants) This keeps the tourneys fast paced and exciting which players love. Fulltilt loves this too, the faster you lose the faster they can make more money off you by having enter another tourney.
There is also another way fulltilt cheats you out of cash with their own personal players. These players are called house players and are fulltime employees of the Fulltilt compnay. If you check some names and their online wins vs. loss records you will often find them with records that are simply unreal. I have seen some of these folks who win over 50 straight sessions without a loss…how can this be possible unless they are working on the inside. They come and go and change their names often but they play in the site with the full adavantage of being able to see all the cards in play and in the deck.
Another programming trick we wrote into the software at fulltilt is the levels trick…this trick takes place when a tournament has been running after the first break. The computer recognizes the different size of each players chip stack and begins to deal out hands in which a small stack will shove all in and a large stack will have a better hand to call with. Have you ever wondered why you get pocekt QQs with 1500 chips and the guy next to you gets pockets KKs and he has 10,000 chips? The answer is simple the site is programmed to get you to play as much as possible. So we programmed the site to eliminate the small stack as quickly as possible so that they can go enter another tourney asap. The site is even prgrammed to adjust the flop for big stacks so that even if the big stack calls your hand with nothing he will end up beating your good made hand by the river. Often times the site will deal you back to back hands with the same cards but maybe different colors or suits..this “glitch” is a sign that the computer is adjusting the shuffle to start elimnting small stacks and allow the tourney to finish quicker.
The sooner a tournament is done the faster fulltilt can have you back at another table spending more money…it is to this sites best interested to eliminate you from tables as fast as possbile. There is no one to regulate how the company manipulates the software to thier own advantage. There is no one to monitor how the company pays out its players and employees. Simply put, giving some offshore account your hard earned cash is simply insane. Thinking that these people arent cheating you out of your money is crazy, the site has many layers of hidden programming all set up to take full adavantage of all types of players from novice to expert.
the main reason i wrote this blog is to expose the fraud that takes place at online gaming site known as Fulltilt poker i was fired three months ago from the company that helped write the software..yes i am bitter and mad but i do fell everyone so know how bad fulltilt is and that is a site built by THIEVES!!
Of course the types of rigging Bobby is revealing to us would be so painfully obvious that anyone with a 100k hand db would be able to see them, yet that's not the case. Hmmm...that must mean one of two things:
1) Bob Smith is an idiot rigtard who is trying to legitimize rigtards everywhere
or
2) Bob Smith is a fucking genius who made up his BS response to get rigtards to believe it so he could reveal later that they're all fucking idiots!
Now I really want to believe it's number 2, but sadly I'm sure it's number 1. :(
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)